Quiet-List 1997

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ...what the Disappointing Article was perhaps saying.

In a message dated 97-10-20 13:01:39 EDT, Richard writes:

<<   "Moralists today forbid what is desired without finding out the
 basic reasons for desire; they prohibit what is enjoyed without finding out
 the basic reasons for enjoyment.  This is like trying to dam a river with
 your hands. >>

  I don't think we right-to-quiet advocates can be compared
  to the kind of "moralists" being addressed by this statement.

  I have no desire to control other people's private consensual
  behavior which does no harm to others.  A guy living out in 
  the remote wilderness can turn up his stereo as loud as he 
  wants so long as he doesn't trouble his neighbors, and I 
  won't complain.

   In regard to the interests of others, I need to add some

      1.  I think it is the duty of public health educators to 
           warn such individuals about the health hazards of 
           excessive noise;

     2.   People who frequently blast their infants and small 
           children with excessively loud noise are guilty of 
           child abuse and should be restrained; and

     3.   I as a taxpayer do not wish to subsidize the hearing
           aids of those who abuse themselves.

       -- Michael Wright
QUIET-LIST:   Internet Mail List and Forum for discussion of Noise Pollution,
Soundscape Awareness, and the Right to Quiet.     Email: "quiet-list@igc.org"
To subscribe, email "majordomo@igc.org" with message "subscribe quiet-list".
For info, send message "info quiet-list" to same.

Home | Date Index | Subject Index