Quiet-List 1997
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Burglar Alarm Noise Torture
In a message dated 97-05-25 14:00:40 EDT, Ray wrote:
<< There is a need to protect the victims of noise pollution against the
aggression of, and victimisation by, the noise perpetrators and therefore
there must be no need for the complainant(s) to be identified or to have to
give evidence in court. The charging authority, the municipality, or the
police, must provide the evidence if required. Perhaps if we start
negotiating
at this level we may land up with a reasonable compromise.... >>
I agree with this whole-heartedly. Are you in Canada or the UK?
Regarding faulty burglar alarms, I think that laws should be passed
prohibiting their sale unless the products have been tested and
have demonstrated safety against false alarms. The testing
should be done by independent researchers, and the results should
be published in peer-reviewed journals. Unless such standards
sale of these products should be outlawed, and all deficient products
installed in homes and autos today should be confiscated.
These products are a serious public health hazard.
-- Michael Wright
Home |
Date Index |
Subject Index