[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
To Annette Feige
Annette Feige said:
>My sentiments exactly. But let's be realistic. Public awareness is low,
>inconsiderate people abound, and by-law enforcement isn't exactly
>cutting-edge. It'll take a lot of work and time to change that. What are we
>to do in the meantime to protect our sanity?
>Should idealism prevent us from insulating our homes or turning on a fan to
>drown out the neighbour's stereo (I use the term technology in a very broad
Unfortunately this is an ideological point of discussion. Cyril Harris, in
his book "Noise Control in Buildings" (McGraw-Hill, 1994), makes a
difference between "noise reduction" and "noise control". And he examplifies
the latter by the adoption of a noise source such as... a fan! at the
reception room of a physician so that his private dialogue with the patient
is not overheard.
Obviously, I don't agree with that point of view. I believe that the same
investment in developing noise-related-technology might be better used to
designing quieter appliances, machines, vehicles, and the same investment in
subsidizing public transport or in noise-related-law enforcement should be
directed towards environmental education.
QUIET-LIST: Internet Mail List and Forum for discussion of Noise Pollution,
Soundscape Awareness, and the Right to Quiet. Email: "firstname.lastname@example.org"
To subscribe, email "email@example.com" with message "subscribe quiet-list".
For info, send message "info quiet-list" to same.
Date Index |