Right to Quiet Society Noiseletter
Spring 2012, page 6

< Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next >   Quiet Home Page


Stabbed to death for noise complaint

A 74-year-old woman was assassinated with four stab wounds inflicted by some young neighbours, whom she reproached for noise disturbances during la Chaya, festivities of carnival, reported police from La Rioja, Argentina, on February 27. The victim from the Province of Catamarca was visiting relatives near the city centre of La Rioja. The stabbing happened the previous night, when Ms. Cabrera complained about the noise in the neighbour’s house, where the festival continued till its end at noon, with the burning or burying of the puillay, the carnival symbol.

The youngsters supposedly felt annoyed by the woman’s complaint and attacked her in her house, stabbing her four times in the thorax, stomach and arms, the wounds of which led to her death. The attackers were detained in different operations early Monday morning. Police did not reveal their identification but said that they were between 24 and 27 years old. Police could secure the blade and handle of the knife, separated, and blood-stained clothing of one attacker. A cellphone belonging to the victim was carried by another one.

Link to article


On a proposed 'Quiet Revolution'

In October 2010, an article by Vancouver Sun columnist Douglas Todd called for a “Quiet Revolution” with regards to noisy stores and restaurants playing loud “music” and/ or TV-sets. That revolution may still be simmering underground. It has not flared up again to our knowledge. Several RtoQ members responded to that “quiet call to arms”. Following below are two of them.

Dear Mr. Todd,

I read with interest your October 23 article in the Vancouver Sun about your proposed “Quiet Revolution” and feel compelled to respond. Unfortunately, I cannot recommend any quiet restaurants in Vancouver because we generally avoid eating out anymore: the volume and style of “music” in most establishments is simply too objectionable.

However, I would like to point out that the issue of force-fed noise in commercial establishments and public spaces is only one aspect of the serious problem of noise pollution that permeates every part of our lives. Even a cursory amount of research on this topic unearths vast amounts of information, both scientific and general interest, confirming that unwanted noise is not simply a nuisance and a conversation killer, but an acoustic contaminant with profound implications for human health.

The physiological and psychological harm caused by noise has long been established by the World Health Organization and other groups. In addition to the hearing loss caused by loud noise, unwanted sound at any level can interfere with sleep (and still affect you even when it doesn’t actually wake you), raise blood pressure, increase heart rate, increase the risk of heart disease, impair concentration and productivity, increase stress, affect mental health, and overall reduce your quality of life. At its extreme, unwanted noise can result in violence and murder.

Anti-noise pollution groups exist all over the world, including here in Vancouver. The mainstream media is full of articles and investigative reports (including a 2001 CBC Marketplace documentary) observing the relentless increase in noise pollution in our society and the harm it causes, and asking what can be done about it. (Over the past several months, I have managed to compile a list of information links that I can send if you are interested and have a few weekends to kill.)

Given the indisputable evidence that unwanted noise is harmful to human health, and the extensive amount of readily accessible information on the subject, the question is why initiatives like your proposed “quiet revolution” did not already occur years ago, and even now may be unlikely to get off the ground.

My own observations, which are nothing new and have been better articulated by others, are that the continued acceptance of noise pollution is linked to the increasing trend in our (un)civil society towards selfish and inconsiderate behaviour, and the obsessive focus on the perceived rights of the individual over the common good. The utter indifference that many individuals and businesses show towards their neighbours and visitors when they choose to pol-lute the acoustic environment – our common soundscape – and impose their noise on others is a typical example. This attitude also feeds on the overwhelming messages our society projects by tolerating and encouraging the kinds of aural assaults you describe in your article: noise is essential (and silence is to be avoided at all costs), the louder the better, and go elsewhere if you don’t like it.

Our local Right to Quiet Society website contains some thoughtful essays in its Readings/Editorials section which, although written over a decade ago, resonate just as strongly today, and mirror many of the concerns reflected in your recent article: the concept of acoustic responsibility, the ways in which our society has become hooked on visual and acoustic stimulation, and the inescapable presence of music in virtually every place of public assembly. In 1998 the Society published the excellent handbook “What You Can Do About Noise in British Columbia,” which is available in all public libraries.

...continued on page 7



Link to top

Entire contents © 2012 Right to Quiet Society. Cartoon © 1996 Right to Quiet Society

< Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next Quiet Home Page